If great photographers had posted their works on online photo discussion boards: “This is just a snapshot. I would not even have considered showing this. If you ware going to post pictures you need to make sure it is of something unusual or with a personal vision.” (via kottke)
Monthly Archive for June, 2006
Something neat, something stupid 1 cmts
Today my sister Shaina came into town to start her orientation at Northeastern University. At the dorm she’s staying in, which, like much of the campus, is very nice and modern and in good condition, the prefrosh are given key cards. They swipe the card with the proctor when they enter the building and then, to get into their rooms, they put the card in the door slot and type “9999″ on the keypad. Genius! Three factor authentication! Here is how I presume it works during the actual school year (assuming everyone and everything is doing its job):
# *Something you are* – You have to be a resident to get into the building (verified by proctor, with a photo that pops up on the screen when you scan your student ID card)
# *Something you have* – You need to have your unique key card (student ID) to put in your door
# *Something you know* – You need to enter your unique (or semi-unique, if it is shared with your roommate) four-digit authorization code
In theory this setup is very, very good as far as security goes, because in order to break into your room an attacker would need to gain entrance to the building (or already live there), steal, find, or clone your key card, and also know your secret code. I suppose there were probably also security cameras around, although I didn’t look too closely, and in fact if they made the decision to *not* put cameras in residential buildings, I’d think that was an excellent move on their part.
Two-factor authentication is considered much more secure than traditional single-factor methods like an ID card or a password. Three-factor is better still. And at NEU it is being done is an intelligent, straight-forward way that serves to increase security while minimizing inconvenience. Very cool.
On the “something stupid” side, on my drive home I was going down route 16, a well-trafficed, badly-lit road, and I saw two kids riding some strange sort of miniture bicycles that were low to the ground, lacked reflectors, and were not outfitted with lights. The kids themselves were wearing dark clothing which was completely unreflective. I only saw them because I passed them as we were both near the end of a parking lot that was lit, and I saw their vague outlines next to me. To add to the complete idiocy of all this, they were riding the *wrong way* down an unlit road with no bike lanes. Into oncoming traffic. At midnight. On mini-bikes. Morons. If they got hit, I’d call it Darwin at work, and wouldn’t shed any tears.
On Tuesday, the parents arrive!
Homeland Security panel boss urges criminal charges against newspapers 0 cmts
The Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Peter King, reportedly said, “[w]e’re at war, and for the Times to release information about secret operations and methods is treasonous.” To him all I can say is I don’t think that word means what you think it means.
Getting in too-much touch (interruption is not collaboration) – Signal vs. Noise (by 37signals) 0 cmts
SvN tells us that interruption is not collaboration. 100% agreed. Whenever I’m at my most productive is inevitably the time when I receive that phone call or someone comes up to ask me something, and it is very frustrating and difficult to recover. No disrespect to my colleagues, especially since its impossible for them to know when I’m at my most productive (and the same goes for me talking to them), but I find the best communication to be email or an IM *not* followed up by a call or visit (as some people are prone to do if they don’t get a quick enough response). I think a good rule of thumb is “if the headphones are on, don’t interrupt.” Now if I could just stop breaking the rule myself.
Generic story about the American government spying on its citizens 0 cmts
It is starting to get a bit tedious, isn’t it? “Under a top secret program initiated by the Bush Administration after the Sept. 11 attacks, the [name of agency (FBI, CIA, NSA, etc.)] have been gathering a vast database of [type of records] involving United States citizens.
Information privacy and police investigations 0 cmts
Mounted on the wall right next to my desk I keep a card, printed by the office of the Harvard University Technology Security Officer that outlines in clear language how I should respond to any requests from law enforcement or others for information. Perhaps if New Jersey had a similar card, this librarian wouldn’t be faced with suspension for trying to do her job, which includes keeping patrons’ records private until served with a proper subpoena signed by a judge.
Meg Hourihan, jam making, and family traditions 0 cmts
Meg Hourihan’s article about making strawberry jam with her grandparents, “Strawberry Fields Forever,” makes me wish my family had similar traditions. While we suburbanites never did much in the way of jam making (or, equally exciting, maple syrup making, like Jeremy does!), I guess there are some other traditions I could learn about, like the secret to good corned beef and chopped liver and salad dressing and potato latkes. It would be fun to do jam, though.
Campus security lapses, exposed 4 years prior by student, lead to data theft 0 cmts
Four years ago a student, investigating the security of campus computer networks for a proposed student government online election system, discovered that grades, financial aid data, and Social Security numbers were readily available. When he reported his findings, he was punished for trespass and the computers were left unsecured. Now, the Unversity has managed to lose over 367,000 student records to more malicious hackers. There’s got to be a lesson in here somewhere about…something. Punishing people for revealing security problems rather than fixing them is a good way to react? No, that’s not it. Hmm…
Researchers develop prototype system to thwart unwanted video and still photography 0 cmts
I think its cool that Georgia Tech geeks are developing a system to neutralize digital cameras in a non-destructive way. I find their assertion that pirated “cam” versions of theatrical releases costs the movie industry $3 billion per year to be ludicrous, and I am suitably unnerved by the prospect of having infrared lasers shooting around a movie theater (and, presumably, into theatergoers eyes) while I’m trying to watch a movie that I would take measures to avoid any theaters using the technology, or, if they’re all using it, of avoiding theaters completely…
Design Observer: writings about design & culture 0 cmts
A phone call to Arnold Newman. Hehe. Cringe.
I'm
Latest Comments
Danny Silverman
Bill P
Mark, yoni, JK
Nat Budin, JK
Bill P, Chris B, Chris B
Matthew Sachs