<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AgBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agblog.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agblog.com</link>
	<description>this is a land of mystery and wonder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:59:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Catastrophic vs first-dollar health insurance by DaveW</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3548/comment-page-1#comment-78786</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3548#comment-78786</guid>
		<description>I agree with Steven&#039;s final bit on the delusion of the American people.  However, I came to comment about how we could *pay* for the catastrophic coverage *and* keep the private system so many people seem to think is awesome (I am not one of those people, but I digress).  Here&#039;s how it would work:  anyone with a catastrophic illness denied coverage by the insurance plans (or those without insurance) would get their treatment paid for by the government.  The government would in turn tax all the CEOs and upper management bonuses at the rate sufficient to pay for said denied coverage.  Problem solved, and the jerks mainly responsible for the problem would pay for it.  :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Steven&#8217;s final bit on the delusion of the American people.  However, I came to comment about how we could *pay* for the catastrophic coverage *and* keep the private system so many people seem to think is awesome (I am not one of those people, but I digress).  Here&#8217;s how it would work:  anyone with a catastrophic illness denied coverage by the insurance plans (or those without insurance) would get their treatment paid for by the government.  The government would in turn tax all the CEOs and upper management bonuses at the rate sufficient to pay for said denied coverage.  Problem solved, and the jerks mainly responsible for the problem would pay for it.  <img src='http://agblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catastrophic vs first-dollar health insurance by steven</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3548/comment-page-1#comment-78779</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3548#comment-78779</guid>
		<description>Are there any new ideas? 

About a decade before Danny was born, many if not most employers provided only catastrophic coverage. The switch to more complete coverage was gradual and I think temporally coincided with the advent of HMOs. 

Having a universal program that covers catastrophes and basic preventative care, while leaving other forms of care as an economic decision for the consumer, seems like a rational plan. But not a rational plan that has any chance of getting through Congress, because the public is still under the delusion that every man, woman and child is somehow entitled to receive $10000 worth of care at $5000 cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any new ideas? </p>
<p>About a decade before Danny was born, many if not most employers provided only catastrophic coverage. The switch to more complete coverage was gradual and I think temporally coincided with the advent of HMOs. </p>
<p>Having a universal program that covers catastrophes and basic preventative care, while leaving other forms of care as an economic decision for the consumer, seems like a rational plan. But not a rational plan that has any chance of getting through Congress, because the public is still under the delusion that every man, woman and child is somehow entitled to receive $10000 worth of care at $5000 cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A possible augmented future by Aaron B</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3545/comment-page-1#comment-78777</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3545#comment-78777</guid>
		<description>Truly terrifying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly terrifying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wonder?  Check. by JK</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3538/comment-page-1#comment-78721</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3538#comment-78721</guid>
		<description>man i&#039;m jealous, that looks like a lot of fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man i&#8217;m jealous, that looks like a lot of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A January Appraisal by Mat</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3527/comment-page-1#comment-78697</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3527#comment-78697</guid>
		<description>How&#039;d painting go? Really good iPad blog as well. Look at all the comment space I&#039;m saving, two comments in one!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;d painting go? Really good iPad blog as well. Look at all the comment space I&#8217;m saving, two comments in one!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The iPad is a blank canvas, teeming with potential by Yoni</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3534/comment-page-1#comment-78687</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3534#comment-78687</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re taking the same direction as Chrome OS (simplify for the smaller form factor! Data in the cloud!) but are doing it by leveraging their existing iPhone technology. I think that&#039;s pretty neat; I&#039;m not nearly as down on the whole thing as everyone else I know seems to be.

That said... I&#039;m waiting for iPad 2.0 (or at least 1.5) - I&#039;ve been burned by 1st-generation Apple devices enough. On top of that, for at least a few months most of the apps will be either straight iPhone apps enlarged, or marginally fixed up for the larger screen, not rethought for the iPad. Simply designing an iPhone app to be resolution-independent isn&#039;t nearly enough; most apps will require an interface rethinking to really take advantage of the options the extra real estate allows, and that&#039;ll probably take time to get right.

Eventually I&#039;ll probably get one and use it 95% as an ebook reader -- but what I&#039;m most excited about isn&#039;t checking my email on the couch or reading books on the bus, it&#039;s the possibilities for music creation. With a little hardware add-on, this thing could become the best travel four-track recorder for musicians in its price range, and/or the niftiest MIDI control interface in recent history. I mean, slap a few inputs and outputs into the 30-pin jack and you could have a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zzounds.com/item--KORKP3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Korg Kaoss Pad&lt;/a&gt; no problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re taking the same direction as Chrome OS (simplify for the smaller form factor! Data in the cloud!) but are doing it by leveraging their existing iPhone technology. I think that&#8217;s pretty neat; I&#8217;m not nearly as down on the whole thing as everyone else I know seems to be.</p>
<p>That said&#8230; I&#8217;m waiting for iPad 2.0 (or at least 1.5) &#8211; I&#8217;ve been burned by 1st-generation Apple devices enough. On top of that, for at least a few months most of the apps will be either straight iPhone apps enlarged, or marginally fixed up for the larger screen, not rethought for the iPad. Simply designing an iPhone app to be resolution-independent isn&#8217;t nearly enough; most apps will require an interface rethinking to really take advantage of the options the extra real estate allows, and that&#8217;ll probably take time to get right.</p>
<p>Eventually I&#8217;ll probably get one and use it 95% as an ebook reader &#8212; but what I&#8217;m most excited about isn&#8217;t checking my email on the couch or reading books on the bus, it&#8217;s the possibilities for music creation. With a little hardware add-on, this thing could become the best travel four-track recorder for musicians in its price range, and/or the niftiest MIDI control interface in recent history. I mean, slap a few inputs and outputs into the 30-pin jack and you could have a <a href="http://www.zzounds.com/item--KORKP3" rel="nofollow">Korg Kaoss Pad</a> no problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The iPad is a blank canvas, teeming with potential by JK</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3534/comment-page-1#comment-78686</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3534#comment-78686</guid>
		<description>I only see screen shots, the differing URLs lead me to believe that those are two distinct apps.  That said they could very well be the same app with a different view based on the resolution.  I don&#039;t see how the second one offers any functionality that the first one couldn&#039;t provide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only see screen shots, the differing URLs lead me to believe that those are two distinct apps.  That said they could very well be the same app with a different view based on the resolution.  I don&#8217;t see how the second one offers any functionality that the first one couldn&#8217;t provide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The iPad is a blank canvas, teeming with potential by Danny Silverman</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3534/comment-page-1#comment-78685</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3534#comment-78685</guid>
		<description>But when it is laid out for 768x1024 rather than 320x480, is it really the same app?

For example &lt;a href=&quot;http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/calendar-ipod.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is not &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/FCKEditorFiles//gallery-software-calendar-20100127.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But when it is laid out for 768&#215;1024 rather than 320&#215;480, is it really the same app?</p>
<p>For example <a href="http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/09/calendar-ipod.jpg" rel="nofollow">this</a> is not <a href="http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/FCKEditorFiles//gallery-software-calendar-20100127.jpg" rel="nofollow">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The iPad is a blank canvas, teeming with potential by JK</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3534/comment-page-1#comment-78684</link>
		<dc:creator>JK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3534#comment-78684</guid>
		<description>I disagree with your last point.  A larger screen doesn&#039;t enable &quot;thousands more&quot; apps.  You&#039;re more likely to see the same apps built in a more resolution independent way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your last point.  A larger screen doesn&#8217;t enable &#8220;thousands more&#8221; apps.  You&#8217;re more likely to see the same apps built in a more resolution independent way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another Challenge for Ethical Eating &#8211; Plants Want to Live, Too by Danny Silverman</title>
		<link>http://agblog.com/entry/3465/comment-page-1#comment-78575</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agblog.com/?p=3465#comment-78575</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/science/22angi.html?permid=4#comment4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;comment #4&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with <a href="http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/science/22angi.html?permid=4#comment4" rel="nofollow">comment #4</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
